Quiz: Can You Identify Errors in This Behavioral Task Analysis?

Explanation:
Behavioral task analyses should include observable and measurable actions. "Think about" is internal and cannot be tracked by an observer, making it inappropriate for this kind of analysis.

Explanation:
Emotional states like pride are internal and subjective. Task analyses must only include observable behaviors. Reinforcement can help build pride, but the feeling itself isn’t a teachable step.

Explanation:
The word "tiny" is subjective and open to interpretation. Task analyses need precise, objective language. Saying "chop vegetables into 1-inch pieces" would be clearer and more measurable.

Explanation:
Starting with "Turn on the faucet" assumes the learner is already at the sink. A proper task analysis should begin with the initial step the learner must take—such as "Walk to the sink"—especially for those with developmental delays who may need support for each micro-action.

Explanation:
This skips essential steps such as “Pour cereal into bowl,” “Pour milk,” and “Get spoon.” Omitting these critical parts can confuse learners and reduce the effectiveness of training.

Explanation:
“Eat the food” is too broad and doesn’t break the action down into teachable parts. Effective task analyses use specific, observable actions like “Scoop food with spoon,” “Bring spoon to mouth,” and “Chew food.”

Explanation:
This instruction assumes the learner already knows how to tie laces and fails to provide the actual steps, defeating the purpose of task analysis, which is to break complex actions into teachable segments.